Skip to content
openaus.org

Education & skills

Does training lead to better work?

One useful result is whether vocational education and training graduates report an improvement in employment. It gives us a view of what happened after training, while leaving questions about access, learning and causation open.

What qualification completers reported

NCVER 2025 survey, covering training undertaken in 2024. This is one vocational training measure, not a score for all Australian education.
62.4%reported improved employment status2025 survey
64.4%in the previous surveySame published headline measure
−2.0 ptschange between surveysPercentage-point change, not percentage change.

What “improved” includes

The measure includes gaining employment, job-related benefits or higher-skilled employment. It is a composite result among qualification completers, not simply the share who found a first job.

What the comparison can establish

The reported share is lower in the later survey. Different labour-market conditions and trainee groups can affect the comparison; it does not estimate what would have happened to the same people without training.

Source and scope: NCVER VET student outcomes 2025

The outcome concerns trainees. It does not measure access among people who could not enrol, the quality of all qualifications or a causal return on government spending.

Open original source

Who shapes the result?

  1. Governments

    Commonwealth and state institutions set or fund parts of training, student support and workforce policy. Responsibility depends on the program.

    National employment and training responsibilities
  2. Training providers

    Providers deliver teaching and qualifications. Participation, completion and learning evidence tell us about delivery.

  3. Employers & workers

    Jobs, workplace needs and opportunities shape whether a qualification translates into useful employment.

Place skills within Australia’s capacityRead the wider work and care account